When will this guy and everyone else LIKE HIM UNDERSTAND THAT NO ONE IS TRYING TO TAKE AWAY ANY GUN EXCEPT THOSE USED REGULARLY IN MASS SHOOTTINGS....THE GUY WANTS TO KEEP A SHOTGUN... a 38 pistol, etc, etc, etc....MORE POWER TO HIM....OUTLAW MILITARY STYLE ASSAULT WEAPONS...I'M SICK OF PARANOID ASSWIPES LIKE THIS GUY CRYING ABOUT "TYRANNY"....ISN'T VIOLENCE ITSELF THE REAL TYRANT?
No, a government or person in power would be a tyrant, as they are able to "oppress" another person or group of people. Violence is defined as the intentional use pf physical force or power. So a "tyrant" could use violence to oppress, but "violence" would not be the tyrant.
AWESOME!
ReplyDeleteThe movie won't run on my smartphone :(
ReplyDeleteToo bad he's statistically five times more likely to shoot himself or his beloved Victoria than an intruder.
ReplyDeleteAMEN BEN HAROLD!!!!!!!!.....MORE GUNS is NOT THE ANSWER any more than MORE GASOLINE will put out a FIRE!!!
DeleteWhen will this guy and everyone else LIKE HIM UNDERSTAND THAT NO ONE IS TRYING TO TAKE AWAY ANY GUN EXCEPT THOSE USED REGULARLY IN MASS SHOOTTINGS....THE GUY WANTS TO KEEP A SHOTGUN... a 38 pistol, etc, etc, etc....MORE POWER TO HIM....OUTLAW MILITARY STYLE ASSAULT WEAPONS...I'M SICK OF PARANOID ASSWIPES LIKE THIS GUY CRYING ABOUT "TYRANNY"....ISN'T VIOLENCE ITSELF THE REAL TYRANT?
ReplyDeleteNo, a government or person in power would be a tyrant, as they are able to "oppress" another person or group of people. Violence is defined as the intentional use pf physical force or power. So a "tyrant" could use violence to oppress, but "violence" would not be the tyrant.
Delete